#incredible love it

[hamletteprinceofdenmark]

I posted 8,644 times in 2022

That's 4,042 more posts than 2021!

635 posts created (7%)

8,009 posts reblogged (93%)

Blogs I reblogged the most:

@rebelpeas

@themagpieszenith

@cupsmp

@jellyjam

I tagged 6,203 of my posts in 2022

Only 28% of my posts had no tags

#dream smp - 2,349 posts

#wilbur soot - 1,832 posts

#tommyinnit - 931 posts

#tubbo - 530 posts

#dracula - 466 posts

#dracula daily - 409 posts

#quackity - 308 posts

#crimeboys - 303 posts

#!!! - 283 posts

#ranboo - 214 posts

Longest Tag: 134 characters

#but all that means is he’s so in his own head that he misses the qte and says ‘you’re welcome’ when the barista says ‘have a nice day’

My Top Posts in 2022:

#5

Just a heads up I’m noticing some confusion!

Lucy talks about two men.

There’s Arthur Holmwood, the “tall, handsome, curly-haired man” Mina asked about, who we have now found out also gets along very well with Lucy’s mum, and is rich and titled (nice). Lucy loves him a lot (she says it three times!)

Then there is also a different man, the doctor in charge of the lunatic asylum. The doctor would be considered a very eligible match (that’s what being a parti means). He is also handsome, also rich, and also from a good family. Young and responsible, he would be just the man for Mina if she wasn’t already happily engaged to Jonathan. Let’s hope nothing … happens … to our friend Jonathan on his Transylvanian travels 👀

Although Lucy likes both men, it’s Arthur who she loves. 👍

Also everyone picking up on the doctor having almost as many red flags as our beloved Count? Good eye! We will get to the asylum storyline soon, and it will be … interesting to see how y’all take it.

Also also, yes, this is the same asylum that backs onto Carfax, Dracula’s new digs.

Hold onto your butts, this rollercoaster’s just getting started!

Happy reading! - Q

2,353 notes - Posted May 11, 2022

#4

Photo ID: a screenshot of a tumblr user’s tags reading: #dracula daily #bram stoker: accidentally write a horror comedy with queer main characters #dracula End ID

———————————————————————

Now I’m not coming after this person or naming them cause it’s not their fault at all but I am begging y’all to understand the queer allegories are not a mistake. They are not a coincidence.

This isn’t a fuddy old timey white man accidentally walking into making an incredibly queer book.

Bram Stoker was most likely a closeted queer man. He started writing Dracula a month after Oscar Wilde’s imprisonment, who was someone he knew personally. He and Walt Whitman wrote very homoerotic letters to each other. It was rumoured he had a massive crush on his boss, Henry Irving, who he wrote a biography on and who he heavily based Dracula’s appearance on (sans the hairy palms and pointy ears lol)

That is the context Dracula was written in. So when Mina and Lucy are galpalling it up, when Lucy’s three weed smoking boyfriends seem very close, when Dracula is jealous and protective of Jonathan and wants to stay up all night talking, please don’t run away with the idea that those are coincidences, or that Stoker was somehow blindly stumbling his way through this.

He knew. It’s on purpose.

2,864 notes - Posted May 10, 2022

#3

A Defence of Dr John “Jack” Seward

Okay I’ve seen a lot of stuff around and I just want to set the record straight as someone who has done a lot of study in Victorian lit and this book in particular.

Dr Seward is not meant to be creepy.

It is vital that you understand this point. He is an equally viable suitor/lover to Lucy as Quincey or Arthur.

A lot of how he’s been read at the moment is being coloured by the odd 125 years that have past between when this book was first published and now.

Lucy has three suitors, Quincey the Cowboy, Arthur the Lord, and Jack the Doctor. They’re each set up to be equally valid and suitable choices for her. This is why she is so torn about choosing Arthur (i.e. English Stability) over Quincey (American Romance/Adventure) and Jack (Rationality, Intelligence, and - some of y’all won’t believe me when I say this - Compassion).

Jack Seward is odd. There’s no beating around the bush as far as that is concerned. He’s awkward, and nerdy, he has all the latest gadgets, and he finds it easier to talk to Lucy about his passions and interests - such as the very latest discoveries in psychology - rather than engage in social niceties and small talk. He almost sits on his silk top hat and he fidgets with a surgical knife when he’s nervous because it’s the only thing in his pocket. It’s very easy to read him as autistic, or otherwise neurodivergent in some way.

He is also, I cannot stress this enough, at the top of his field. What we see today as archaic and ableist practises were to Stoker’s contemporary reader some of the most compassionate and patient-first mental health work of it’s time. We’re going to learn more about the asylum as we go on, but it’s a very interesting case study of The Other.

The Other is what ultimately rules out Seward as a viable romantic candidate for Lucy. While he is English, “an excellent parti [marriage candidate], being handsome, well off, and of good birth,” while “he is a doctor and really clever,” while “he is only nine-and-twenty, and he has an immense lunatic asylum all under his own care,” he is ultimately too close to the strange and unusual, to the Other, to the mad, to be a good match for Lucy, an up and coming socialite.

She cannot choose Quincey because he is American (foreign and therefore also Other), and engages in lowly things like slang. He is an adventurous and Romantic (used in the classical rather than colloquial sense) Hero, and again ultimately unsuitable for our Lucy.

It is Arthur Holmwood (later The Honourable Lord Godalming), the English gentry that Lucy must court and ultimately wed. This is also why Arthur seems so much less fleshed out and boring compared to the other two suitors. The contemporary reader would immediately understand and fill in everything you needed to know about him from context. He is the most familiar figure to a British public, where the others are … well … Other.

I also want to go over what Jack wrote today, because it’s not nearly as damning as people are making it out to be.

Miserable after being rejected by the woman he loves, Jack throws himself into his work instead. He records his diary on a phonograph, the very latest in Victorian tech, and relates that day’s studies on the patient he finds the most fascinating, R.M. Renfield. A lot of psych work at the time - and today! - revolves around the idea of understanding how a mental patient’s mind works by close analysis, hypothesis, and practical testing and observation. This is what Seward conducts.

Still emotionally unstable himself from the recent rejection, he reflects that there was a level of cruelty in how he treated Renfield that day, which he immediately regrets. He recognises that he went too far, and that it was his own fault, and was irresponsible and wrong as Renfield’s Doctor and as Head of the asylum.

He confesses that he wanted to “keep him to the point of his madness” (i.e. encourage or even worsen Renfield’s condition in order to study it further) something that under normal circumstances would be “a thing which I avoid with the patients as I would the mouth of hell.”

This isn’t a mad scientist gleefully torturing people he considers subhuman, this is a Doctor who cares deeply about his patients and feels terrible his own personal emotional distress led him to hurt rather than to heal.

He let emotion get the better of him, something he considers selfish and indulgent, and he reflects that a selfish man is as much a danger to the people around him as to himself. He resolves to work from a place of duty, from a place which prioritises the well-being of his patients, from now on, and to be more conscientious and aware of his actions and how they affect others in the future.

That is the musings of a Good Doctor! And a Good Man! He is working from a 19th Century understanding of what that means, but that does not minimise the intent and spirit of his character!

Please stop writing Seward off as the creepy asylum man. He is so much more than that, and more than an equal match to Quincey and Arthur.

3,537 notes - Posted May 26, 2022

#2

I love how Dracula Daily has given me a new perspective on Lucy. It’s completely changed my view of her.

It’s easy to dismiss Lucy as a shallow, golden child socialite to be, but now, reading the book in chronological order (and with the rest of Tumblr following along) I can’t read this latest letter without a great twinge of sadness, where before I largely dismissed it as idle chat.

The latest we heard from Lucy in her private diary was about how stressed and scared she is, how she feels isolated, how she feels the need to quiet people’s fears about her health and be fun and jolly, while in reality she is (literally and figuratively) drained.

And now, five days later, she writes to Mina after receiving her best friend’s glowing letter about how happy and excited she is to finally be married to Jonathan and their hopes for the future.

So Lucy puts on a brave face! She doesn’t tell Mina anything. What could Mina do anyway? All the way across the ocean? Better not to worry her. Yes I’m quite well again! No more sleepwalking for me! Definitely not :)

You and Jonathan should come back home soon! For Jonathan’s sake! (Please)

With this new lens, we read between the lines, and they paint a dreadfully lonely and terrifying picture.

3,905 notes - Posted August 30, 2022

My #1 post of 2022

For all my Dracula Daily folks who might not read 19th Century lit on the regular “making a hasty toilet” means like … “I freshened up quickly before dinner because I just spent hours and hours on a dusty road and feel kind of gross” not “I am telling you explicitly that I took a shit and was hasty about it”

24,136 notes - Posted May 6, 2022

Get your Tumblr 2022 Year in Review →

[lesbianrecorderplayer]

One thing I truly love about Mabel is that she is completely genuine and sincere weird little girl representation. She has a morbid sense of humour. She grew up with a horrifying plush bear called Bear-O and literally everybody hated him. Her prized possession is a pig whom she won at a carnival, claiming to be a witch while doing so. Her initial design for a wax figure was a fairy princess horse fairy princess. She punched a unicorn. She draws portraits of her friends on cats and sells them for a profit. Her dream boyfriend is a Bill and Ted clone who has a masters in law. She's scared of stop motion. Her uncle didn't like colours so she hatched a plan with her friends to blind him. When her uncle offered her a free gift from his shop, she took a grappling hook without even considering any other option. One time she said the sentence "it's covered in my blood, sweat, tears, and other fluids." No one is doing it like her

[sunbloomdew]

do you ever see a person and you are overcome with incredible fondness? and you just think "oh." but not in a romantic or sexual way you are just filled with warmth and it makes you happy, it just does. and you think "i'm so happy you exist. i'm happy you are somewhere out there in the world, doing your thing". it's love but also not entirely

like people are lovely and i feel it in my entire chest like a burning candle that smells like roses and a sunny day

[lemongogo]

dont forget what happened to icarus

[isjasz]

[mob killing noises] BAM!!!!1111!!

[callonpeevesie]

I'm onto something I'm telling you

[kensatou]

"we know how to move our bodies, but i didn't know how to manage my heart, so you need help for this"

hi we need to talk more about judo gold medallist christa deguchi.

[nipuni]

"Midnight" is one of my favourite episodes!!

A speedpaint video of this will be available at my Patreon on may 1st

[goryfluff]

Nautilus expedition live streams (+ their commentary) 2020 / 2021 / 2022

[platoapproved]

louis + cruelty

[tearlessrain]

please help me- i used to be pretty smart but i’m having so much trouble grasping the concept of diegetic vs non-diegetic bdsm!

gfkjldghfd okay first of all I'm sorry for the confusion, if you're not finding anything on the phrase it's because I made it up and absolutely nobody but me ever uses it, but I haven't found a better way to express what I'm trying to say so I keep using it. but now you've given me an excuse to ramble on about some shit that is only relevant to me and my deeply inefficient way of talking and by god I'm going to take it.

SO. the way diegetic and non-diegetic are normally used is to talk about music and sound design in movies/tv shows. in case you aren't familiar with that concept, here's a rundown:

diegetic sound is sound that happens within the world of the movie/show and can be acknowledged by the characters, like a song playing on the stereo during a driving scene, or sung on stage in Phantom of the Opera. it's also most other sounds that happen in a movie, like the sounds of traffic in a city scene, or a thunderclap, or a marching band passing by. or one of the three stock horse sounds they use in every movie with a horse in it even though horses don't really vocalize much in real life, but that's beside the point, the horse is supposed to be actually making that noise within the movie's world and the characters can hear it whinnying.

non-diegetic sound is any sound that doesn't exist in the world of the movie/show and can't be perceived by the characters. this includes things like laugh tracks and most soundtrack music. when Duel of Fates plays in Star Wars during the lightsaber fight for dramatic effect, that's non-diegetic. it exists to the audience, but the characters don't know their fight is being backed by sick ass music and, sadly, can't hear it.

the lines can get blurry between the two, you've probably seen the film trope where the clearly non-diegetic music in the title sequence fades out to the same music, now diegetic and playing from the character's car stereo. and then there are things like Phantom of the Opera as mentioned above, where the soundtrack is also part of the plot, but Phantom of the Opera does also have segments of non-diegetic music: the Phantom probably does not have an entire orchestra and some guy with an electric guitar hiding down in his sewer just waiting for someone to break into song, but both of those show up in the songs they sing down there.

now, on to how I apply this to bdsm in fiction.

if I'm referring to diegetic bdsm what I mean is that the bdsm is acknowledged for what it is in-world. the characters themselves are roleplaying whatever scenarios their scenes involve and are operating with knowledge of real life rules/safety practices. if there's cnc depicted, it will be apparent at some point, usually right away, that both characters actually are fully consenting and it's all just a planned scene, and you'll often see on-screen negotiation and aftercare, and elements of the story may involve the kink community wherever the characters are. Love and Leashes is a great example of this, 50 Shades and Bonding are terrible examples of this, but they all feature characters that know they're doing bdsm and are intentional about it.

if I'm talking about non-diegetic bdsm, I'm referring to a story that portrays certain kinks without the direct acknowledgement that the characters are doing bdsm. this would be something like Captive Prince, or Phantom of the Opera again, or the vast majority of bodice ripper type stories where an innocent woman is kidnapped by a pirate king or something and totally doesn't want to be ravished but then it turns out he's so cool and sexy and good at ravishing that she decides she's into it and becomes his pirate consort or whatever it is that happens at the end of those books. the characters don't know they're playing out a cnc or D/s fantasy, and in-universe it's often straight up noncon or dubcon rather than cnc at all. the thing about entirely non-diegetic bdsm is that it's almost always Problematic™ in some way if you're not willing to meet the story where it's at, but as long as you're not judging it by the standards of diegetic bdsm, it's just providing the reader the same thing that a partner in a scene would: the illusion of whatever risk or taboo floats your boat, sometimes to extremes that can't be replicated in real life due to safety, practicality, physics, the law, vampires not being real, etc. it's consensual by default because it's already pretend; the characters are vehicles for the story and not actually people who can be hurt, and the reader chose to pick up the book and is aware that nothing in it is real, so it's all good.

this difference is where people tend to get hung up in the discourse, from what I've observed. which is why I started using this phrasing, because I think it's very crucial to be able to differentiate which one you're talking about if you try to have a conversation with someone about the portrayal of bdsm in media. it would also, frankly, be useful for tagging, because sometimes when you're in the mood for non-diegetic bodice ripper shit you'd call the police over in real life, it can get really annoying to read paragraphs of negotiation and check-ins that break the illusion of the scene and so on, and the opposite can be jarring too.

it's very possible to blur these together the same way Phantom of the Opera blurs its diegetic and non-diegetic music as well. this leaves you even more open to being misunderstood by people reading in bad faith, but it can also be really fun to play with. @not-poignant writes fantastic fanfic, novels, and original serials on ao3 that pull this off really well, if you're okay with some dark shit in your fiction I would highly recommend their work. some of it does get really fucking dark in places though, just like. be advised. read the tags and all that.

but yeah, spontaneous writer plug aside, that's what I mean.

[blondeheaven]

Sheee delight

[that1geek06]

"English isn't my-"

Hush now my friend, and let me read the absolute beauty of a fic that you have bestowed this world and humiliated the first English speakers with

[ahhlehlehlehleh]

"You're as beautiful as the day I lost you."

personal headcanon: Orion fell in love with D-16 and had planned on confessing to him but lost the opportunity do so through the events of the movie BUT even as Optimus and Megatron he still held feelings for him.

[splendidfemalelegs]

Getting raunchy in the ranch

[dustykneed]

survival is an act of rebellion. jim loves you SO MUCH. i hope this finds all of us who need it today. please stay alive so we can make it out together. sending so much love and strength